Spencer v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.3d 467 · 2014
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2020
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Bell v. Wolfish · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Lorenzo Montez v. Mark McKinna · McIntosh v. United States Parole Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“firmly [stood] in the camp of allowing conditions-of-confinement claims to be brought in the habeas corpus context,” whereas the Eighth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits held that habeas petitions are not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nettles v. Grounds
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.