Haselwander v. McHugh’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.3d 990 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Singleton v. Wulff · United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc. · Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a [military records] correction board fails to correct an injustice clearly presented in the record before it,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Code v. Esper“if the agency reasonably should have understood the full extent of [the plaintiff's] argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“never found that any of the evidence submitted by [the plaintiff] lacked credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.