Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 FSUPP 331 - Janicsko v. Pellman

Janicsko v. Pellman’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the relevant provisions of the Mental Health Code were enacted ... to encourage commitments, any more than state repossession laws are passed because states want to encourage creditors to repossess their debtors' goods.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to determine if it replaces private physician or facility discretion with state mandated standards and to determine whether the state compels or encourages a facility’s or physician’s actions with regard to involuntary commitment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.