Paradis v. Dooley’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Van Dusen v. Barrack · 676 F. Supp. 437 - Levinger v. Matthew Stuart & Co., Inc. · 695 F. Supp. 644 - Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the interest in having the trial of a diversity case in a forum that is at home with the law that must govern the action; 2) the avoidance of unnecessary problems in conflict of laws, or in the application of foreign law; 3) the local interest in having localized controversies decided at home; 4) the unfairness of burdening citizens in an unrelated forum with jury duty; and 5) administrative difficulties flowing from court congestion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“1) the availability of compulsory process for attendance of unwilling witnesses; 2) the cost of obtaining attendance of willing witnesses; 3) the relative ease of access to sources of proof; 4) the possibility of a view of premises, if such a view would be appropriate to the action; and 5) all other practical problems that make trial of a ease easy, expeditious and inexpensive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) states: For the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.