774 F. Supp. 2d 147 - Aref v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 23 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, acceptable as true, to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” ... A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is hable for the misconduct alleged.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 80 F. Supp. 3d 198 - Auleta v. United States Department of Justice · 981 F. Supp. 2d 55 - Brookens v. United States of America

2. “(a) [t]he inmate’s current offense(s) of conviction, or offense conduct, included association, communication, or involvement, related to international or domestic terrorism; (b) [t]he inmate’s current offense(s) of conviction, offense conduct, or activity while incarcerated, indicates a propensity to encourage, coordinate, facilitate, or otherwise act in furtherance of, illegal activity through communication with persons in the community; (c) [t]he inmate has attempted, or indicates a propensity, to contact victims of the inmate’s current offense(s) of conviction; (d) [t]he inmate committed prohibited activity related to misuse/abuse of approved communication methods while incarcerated; or (e) [t]here is any other evidence of a potential threat to the safe, secure, and orderly operation of prison facilities, or protection of the public, as a result of the inmate’s unmonitored communication with persons in the community.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 953 F. Supp. 2d 133 - Aref v. Holder

3. “Your current offenses of conviction are for Conspiracy to Commit Murder in a Foreign Country; Conspiracy to Kidnap, Maim, and Torture; and Providing Material Support to a Terrorist Organization. You acted in a criminal conspiracy to raise money to support mujahideen operations and used religious training to recruit other individuals in furtherance of criminal acts in this country as well as many countries abroad. Your offense conduct included significant communication, association and assistance to al-Qaida, a group which has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 953 F. Supp. 2d 133 - Aref v. Holder