774 So. 2d 194 - State ex rel. E.N.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 719 So. 2d 445 - State, in Interest of Sm · 620 So. 2d 1309 - State in Interest of LLZ v. MYS · State ex rel. D.T. v. K.T. · 540 So. 2d 1244 - State, in Interest of Jml · State, in Interest of Hd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) Misconduct of the parent toward this child or any other child of the parent or any other child in his household which constitutes extreme abuse, cruel and inhuman treatment, or grossly negligent behavior below a reasonable standard of human decency, including but not limited to the conviction, commission, aiding or abetting, attempting, conspiring, or soliciting to commit any of the following: (a) Murder. (b) Unjustified intentional killing. (c) Aggravated incest. (d) Rape. (e) Sodomy. (f) Torture. (g) Starvation. (h) A felony that has resulted in serious bodily injury. (i) Abuse or neglect which is chronic, life threatening, or results in gravely disabling physical or psychological injury or disfigurement. |4(j) Abuse or neglect after the child is returned to the parent’s care and custody while under department supervision, when the child had previously been removed for his safety from the parent pursuant to a disposition judgment in a child in need of care proceeding. (k) The parent’s parental rights to one or more of the child’s siblings have been terminated due to neglect or abuse and prior attempts to rehabilitate the parent have been unsuccessful. (l) Sexual abuse, which shall include, but is not limited to acts which are prohibited by R.S. 14: 43.1, 43.2, 80, 81, 81.1, 81.2, 89 and 89.1. [[Image here]] (5) Unless sooner • permitted by the court, at least one year has elapsed since a child was removed from the parent’s custody pursuant to a court order; there has be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.