Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 SO2D 361 - Richard v. Workover & Completion

Richard v. Workover & Completion’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 593 So. 2d 357 - Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc. · Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. · 610 So. 2d 953 - Dyson v. State Emp. Group Ben. Program · 642 So. 2d 1291 - Manuel v. Wal-Mart Stores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough the definition of accident was amended to emphasize that the identifiable, precipitous event must be more than a gradual deterioration or progressive degeneration, jurisprudence holds that these terms do not exclude those instances where a worker can establish a work-related event, which may seem to be a customary or routine work activity, which results in an injury to the employee.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Accident" means an unexpected or unforeseen actual, identifiable, precipitous event happening suddenly or violently, with or without human fault, and directly producing at the time objective findings of an injury which is more than simply a gradual deterioration or progressive degeneration.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; and (2) the worker’s testimony is corroborated by the circumstances following the alleged incident. Corroboration of the worker’s testimony may be provided by the testimony of fellow workers, spouses or friends. Corroboration may also be provided by medical evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.