774 So. 2d 608 - George v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Ex Parte Ingram · Cantu v. State · Baker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is well settled that `claims challenging the voluntariness of a guilty plea, as well as claims alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel, may be raised for the first time in a timely filed Rule 32 petition.' George v. State , 774 So.2d 608 , 609 (Ala.Crim.App. 2000). See also Ex parte Ingram , 675 So.2d 863 (Ala. 1996); Baker v. State , 717 So.2d 859 (Ala.Crim.App. 1996); and Cantu v. State , 660 So.2d 1026 (Ala. 1994)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.