774 So. 2d 629 - Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “attacking the constitutionality of the Florida Bar Rule of Professional Conduct governing interviews of jurors [was] procedurally barred because Rose could have raised this issue on direct appeal”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 850 So. 2d 417 - Marquard v. State · 911 So. 2d 57 - Elledge v. State

2. “[1] The evidence at issue must be favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory, or because it is impeaching; [2] that evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and [3] prejudice must have ensued.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Harley v. State · 854 So. 2d 1235 - Marshall v. State

3. “this Court must accept [the defendant's] factual allegations as true to the extent they are not refuted by the record.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Mungin v. State · 872 So. 2d 230 - Tompkins v. State