Hodges v. Marion County’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 619 So. 2d 983 - Williams v. City of Minneola · City Council of North Miami Beach v. Trebor Construction Corp. · 246 So. 2d 789 - Tsavaras v. Lelekis · 599 So. 2d 737 - Gabor v. Gabor & Co., Inc. · 530 So. 2d 1023 - City of Pompano Beach v. Haggerty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Marion County contends that the law of the case doctrine should not be applied in this case based on the "manifest injustice" exception, recognized by this court in Williams v. City of Minneola, 619 So.2d 983 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). In Williams, the manifest injustice exception was applied with regard to an issue which had not been addressed in the previous appeal. Such is not the case here. Additionally, Marion County fails to articulate what manifest injustice it contends would result from adherence to the law of the case, other than its apparent belief that Hodges I was incorrectly decided. Such a contention does not support the application of a manifest injustice exception to the law of the case doctrine (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.