Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 SW2D 247 - Rogers v. State

Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015 · most notably Allridge v. State (1991), Hernandez v. State (1991)

66 state decisions

5201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Chimel v. California · Neil v. Biggers · Gregg v. Georgia · Manson v. Brathwaite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall allow testimony to be introduced at any time before the argument of a cause is concluded, if it appears that it is necessary to a due administration of justice.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This statute has been construed to mean that a trial judge commits reversible error when he refuses a request to reopen for the purpose of producing relevant and admissible evidence, regardless of its weight or the issue upon which it is offered, so long as the request is timely under the statute and does not threaten to unduly impede the trial. Vital v. State, 523 S.W.2d 662, 664-665 (Tex.Cr.App.1975).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Both under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and under Art. 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution, searches of a person and the area within his immediate control are excepted from the requirement of a warrant when incident to the lawful arrest of such person and otherwise proper in scope....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.