Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 S.W.2d 418 - James v. State

James v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 291st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · Royster v. State · Williams v. Texas · Williams v. State · Eldred v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before the court reads his charge to the jury, counsel for both sides shall have a reasonable time to present written instructions and ask that they be given to the jury. The requirement that the instructions be in writing is complied with if the instructions are dictated to the court reporter in the presence of the court and the state’s counsel, before the reading of the court’s charge to the jury. The court shall give or refuse these charges. The defendant may, by a special requested instruction call the trial court’s attention to error in the charge, as well as omissions therefrom, and no other exception or objection to the court’s charge shall be necessary to preserve any error reflected by any special requested instruction which the trial court refuses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.