Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

774 S.W.2d 573

Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1989

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1989-08-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1990

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MANFORD, Judge.

¶1This appeal is presented pro se following a hearing upon a Rule 29.15 motion wherein movant was represented by counsel. The hearing court denied relief.

¶2This appeal is dismissed for the following reasons:

¶3There is no jurisdictional statement, no statement of facts, and no points relied upon. Presentment of the appeal violates Rule 30.06 and Rule 84.04. In addition, movant presented 42 various claims in his motion which involved trial error and ineffectiveness of counsel. The trial errors are not cognizable by a Rule 29.15 motion. The claims of ineffectiveness of counsel were previously addressed by direct appeal. There remains nothing for this court to review.

¶4Appeal dismissed.

¶5All concur.

/774/sw2d/573 · .json · Public domain