Geyen v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
775 F.2d 1303 · 1985
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Martinez v. United States (2003), National Association of Government Employees v. City Public Service Board of San Antonio Texas
58 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 1553 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 38 U.S.C. § 3103 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · United States v. Kubrick · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fiction that an action alleging unlawful conduct by a federal official ... and an agency, is not an action against the United States”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the defendant must show (1) a delay in asserting the right or claim; (2) that the delay was not excusable; and (3) that there was undue prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Goodman v. Lee“imposes an obligation, denies a right, or fixes a legal relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.