United States v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis
775 F.2d 604 · 1985
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2009
13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Oliver v. United States · Michel v. United States · Reavis v. Antinore · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Williams v. Zbaraz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person's participation in a conspiracy ends when that person is arrested for his role in the conspiracy. . . . '[F]urther [participation in an] old conspiracy after being charged with that crime becomes a new offense for purposes of a Double Jeopardy claim.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is well settled that a person's participation in a conspiracy ends when that person is arrested for his role in the conspiracy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.