Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 775 F.2d 638 - Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.

Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

775 F.2d 638 · 1985

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. · Bean Dredging Corporation v. Dredge Technology Corporation v. Rogers-Olympic Corporation, American Employers Insurance Company v. Dredge Technology Corporation v. Rogers-Olympic Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “made no attempt to limit the states in which its product was marketed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.