Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 775 F.2d 670 - United States v. Jeter

United States v. Jeter’s Empirical Analysis

775 F.2d 670 · 1985

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

66 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably United States v. North (1990), United States v. Rahman (1999)

66 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

52019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Benton v. Maryland · Morissette v. United States · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Russello v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an endeavor to influence a juror in the performance of his or her duty or to influence, obstruct or impede the due administration of justice is per se unlawful and is tantamount to doing the act corruptly.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “general intent of knowledge as well as the specific intent of purpose to obstruct”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A grand juror ... shall not disclose matters occurring before the grand jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.