United States v. Gladding’s Empirical Analysis
775 F.3d 1149 · 2014
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2253
Relies on United States v. Martinson · Ramsden v. United States · United States v. Fitzen · United States v. Kaczynski · United States v. Bainbridge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the property in question COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0) 1947B 11 is no longer needed for evidentiary purposes, either because trial is complete, the defendant has pleaded guilty, or. . . the government has abandoned its investigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“taking into account the time needed to image and search the data and any prejudice to the aggrieved party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.