Bies v. Sheldon’s Empirical Analysis
775 F.3d 386 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Coleman v. Thompson · United States v. Agurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Balcarcel“that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Balcarcel“'AEDPA deference' does not apply and [this Court] will review the claim de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Balcarcel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.