Left Fork Mining Co. v. Hooker’s Empirical Analysis
775 F.3d 768 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 801 (Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972) · 30 U.S.C. § 813 · 30 U.S.C. § 814 · 30 U.S.C. § 815 · 30 U.S.C. § 816 · 30 U.S.C. § 817 · 30 U.S.C. § 818 · 30 U.S.C. § 820
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Davis v. Passman · Carlson v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Bivens remedy is available only if (1) there are no alternative, existing processes for protecting a constitutional interest and, (2) even in the absence of an alternative, there are no special factors counselling hesitation before authorizing a new kind of federal litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jacobs v. Alam“limited, implied cause of action against federal employees for particularly egregious violations of the Fourth Amendment in an unlawful search and seizure case brought by a private citizen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jacobs v. Alam“alternative, existing process for protecting the [constitutional] interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Koprowski v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.