Minnick v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
775 F.3d 929 · 2015
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
September 2022
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Clifford v. Apfel · Craft v. Astrue · Bjornson v. Astrue · Terry v. Astrue · Brindisi ex rel. Brindisi v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In considering whether a claimant's condition meets or equals a listed impairment, an ALJ must discuss the listing by name and offer more than a perfunctory analysis of the listing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]vidence of nerve root compression characterized by neuro-anatomic distribution of pain, limitation of motion of the spine, motor loss (atrophy with associated muscle weakness or muscle weakness) accompanied by sensory or reflex loss[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“discern from the ALJ's scant analysis whether [he] considered and dismissed, or completely failed to consider, this pertinent evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.