Jersild v. Aker’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on McKnight v. General Motors Corp. · 94 Wis. 2d 17 - Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc. · 83 Wis. 2d 406 - Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc. · 118 Wis. 2d 730 - Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation · Fleming v. County of Kane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the readily apparent legislative goal underlying the enactment of § 100.18 is to protect all members of [the] public 22 No. 2017AP2361 from fraudulent advertisements and deceptive marketing practices, in its practical application, the section individually protects each member of the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.