775 F. Supp. 247 - Henry v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2011
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Schmerber v. State of California · Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t would appear that probable cause is a necessary element of a grand jury subpoena compelling a bodily intrusion. A probable cause requirement, however, seems untenable in the grant jury situation. The purpose of a grand jury is to determine whether there is probable cause to charge an individual with a crime. Burdening a grand jury with a probable cause requirement seems inconsistent with that purpose.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“); Henry v. Ryan, 775 F.Supp. 247, 253 (N.D.Ill.1991) (holding that a saliva sample is a Fourth Amendment search because”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court's enforcement of a blood sample subpoena not only because the sample was a minimal physical intrusion but because the sample would provide highly relevant and probative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.