775 F. Supp. 2d 574 - Linton v. Bradt’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. Taylor · Crawford v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the standard for evaluating whether there has been a constitutional error resulting from an evidentiary error is whether such error was 'so pervasive as to have denied [the defendant] a fundamentally fair trial,’ ” and that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evans v. Fischer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.