People v. Exline’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2000
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · People v. Lowe · People v. Moody · People v. Koon · People v. DISTRICT COURT FOR DENVER
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he right of a defendant to confront his accusers is not equivalent to a constitutionally compelled rule of pretrial discovery. Rather, the right of confrontation is a trial right, guaranteeing an opportunity for effective cross-examination. See Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 , 107 S.Ct. 989 , 94 L.E.2d 40 (1987).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lane · State v. Rhyne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.