Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 775 P.2d 65 - King v. Everett

King v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27 · Davidson Chevrolet, Inc. v. City & County of Denver · In the Interest of Clinton · Mortgage Finance, Inc. v. Podleski · E.B. Jones Construction Co. v. City & County of Denver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and does not include irregular or erroneous applications of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.