Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

775 So. 2d 1001

Skolnick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 27, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-12-27

Relies on 681 So. 2d 1136 - King v. State · 773 So. 2d 1237 - McFadden v. State · 748 So. 2d 314 - Welling v. State

Decided 2000-12-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1Kevin Skolnick challenges his sentence, claiming that the trial court erred in imposing a habitual offender sentence as a result of a violation of probation. We agree for the reasons discussed in our recent opinion in McFadden v. State, 773 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) analyzing Welling v. State, 748 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) and King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136, 1138-39 (Fla.1996).

¶2As in McFaddenwe reverse and remand the case with instructions that Skolnick be sentenced according to the sentencing guidelines.

POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
/775/so2d/1001 · .json · Public domain