Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

775 So. 2d 1002

Heaton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 3, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-01-03

Relies on Arce v. State · 748 So. 2d 314 - Welling v. State · Gatto v. State

Decided 2001-01-03

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence. See Welling v. State, 748 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Arce v. State, 762 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant presenting his gain-time claim administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if necessary, seeking review of the Department’s ultimate decision through extraordinary writ petition to the circuit court. See Gatto v. State, 768 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/775/so2d/1002 · .json · Public domain