¶1specially concurring.
¶2I concur only because I am required to do so because of Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
775 So. 2d 1002
Rogers v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 29, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-12-29
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2001
1 state decisions
Relies on 764 So. 2d 829 - Hampton v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-12-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →