775 So. 2d 321 - Elharda v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 756 So. 2d 42 - Peart v. State · 684 So. 2d 258 - Perriello v. State · 605 So. 2d 985 - Marriott v. State · 745 So. 2d 469 - State v. Rajaee · Sanders v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, unlike the defendant in Rajaee , Elharda was not given any warning at all about the deportation consequences of his plea and thus was not placed `on notice' that he should be certain that he was a United States citizen before entering his plea. In the absence of such notice, Elharda's mistaken response to an improper inquiry should not excuse compliance with the rule, especially where there is resulting prejudice in the nature of the institution of deportation proceedings against a pleading defendant who was not advised of the deportation consequences of the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“even if the trial court had given Elharda the admonition that his plea may subject him to deportation, there is no doubt that Elharda would still have accepted the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.