775 So. 2d 735 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(5) Voice Identification. Identification of a voice, whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the voice at any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker. (6) Telephone Conversations. Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or business, if (A) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self-identification, show the person answering to be the one called .... (9) Process or System. Evidence describing a process or system used to produce a result and showing that the process or system produces an accurate result.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Herman Jackson, Jr. v. State of Mississippi

2. “Authentication of evidence requires the offering party to lay a proper foundation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Herman Jackson, Jr. v. State of Mississippi

3. “support[s] a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Herman Jackson, Jr. v. State of Mississippi