Krupa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1989

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1989-04-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1990

2 state decisions

Relies on Sheffield v. State · Krupa v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant was convicted by a jury for criminal mischief and assessed 5 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed. Krupa v. State, 750 S.W.2d 258 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising three grounds for review.

¶3We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

¶4With this understanding, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

*645TEAGUE, J., would grant, and MILLER, J., would grant grounds 2 and 3.