Tulloss v. Near North Montessori School, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.2d 150 · 1985
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Daniels v. Essex Group, Inc. (1991), Ratliff v. City of Milwaukee (1986)
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'mish-mash of self-serving and hearsay statements and records....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in all circuits, the trial judge has ... great discretion”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[It] does not represent the only method by which a plaintiff may make out a claim of intentional discrimination nor was it “intended to be rigid, mechanized, or ritualistic” in application_ The ultimate question in any Title VII disparate treatment case is whether the action was founded in a discriminatory intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.