Orlando v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.2d 209 · 1985
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Herron v. Shalala (1994), 17282a Andrade v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1993)
38 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Stephens v. Heckler · Garfield v. Schweiker · Zblewski v. Schweiker · Zalewski v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'as generally required by employers throughout the national economy.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crist v. Bowen · Williams v. Bowen““... more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.””
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must articulate at some minimal level his analysis of the evidence in 'cases in which considerable evidence is presented to counter the agency's position.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.