Local United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.2d 23 · 1985
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2002 · most notably Carlisle Area School v. Scott P. ex rel. Bess P. (1995), Abbey's Transportation Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1988)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Katz · National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · American Ship Building Company v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Local 259, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. NLRB, 776 F.2d 23 , 27 (2d Cir. 1985);”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]n Administrative Law Judge's factual findings are part of the record and cannot be ignored,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“depends largely on the importance of credibility in the particular case,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.