In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.2d 335 · 1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 1989
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 18 U.S.C. § 6004
Relies on In re Kilgo · In re United States Senate Select Committee · In re Tse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On page 2 of the bill you will find section 6001 [identical to what is now codified at 18 U.S.C. Sec. 6002]. That section would provide that when a witness refuses on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination to testify or to provide other information, and the witness is presented with an order of the court compelling his testimony, and granting him immunity from the use of such testimony and its fruits, then the witness must testify under pain of contempt of court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the person presiding over the proceeding communicates to the witness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the person presiding over the proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.