Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 776 F.2d 960 - Broughton v. Heckler

Broughton v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

776 F.2d 960 · 1985

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Lewis v. Callahan (1997), MaCgregor v. Bowen (1986)

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

29019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc. · Wiggins v. Schweiker · Smith v. Schweiker · Oldham v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Secretary] must accord 'substantial' or 'considerable' weight to the opinion of a claimant's treating physician unless 'good cause' is shown to the contrary.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the opinion of a non-examining physician is entitled to little weight if it is contrary to the opinion of the claimant's treating physician.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is not only legally relevant but unquestionably logical that the opinions, diagnosis, and medical evidence of a treating physician whose familiarity with the patient's injuries, course of treatment, and responses over a considerable length of time, should be given considerable weight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.