United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.3d 134 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1346 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Ashe v. Swenson · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Abney v. United States · Stirone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he collateral-order exception announced in [Cohen] ... gives us latitude to exercise immediate review over orders that ... ‘conclusively determine the disputed question, resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and [are] effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.’” United States v. Wright, 776 F.3d 134, 140 (3d Cir. 2015) (citation omitted, emphasis added). 2 . See Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)(2) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) a clear abuse of discretion or clear error of law; (2) a lack of an alternate avenue for adequate relief; and (3) a likelihood of irreparable injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.