Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 776 F.3d 285 - Savant v. APM Terminals

Savant v. APM Terminals’s Empirical Analysis

776 F.3d 285 · 2014

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Scott v. Harris · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'Neill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is appropriate only if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A genuine dispute of material fact exists when the 'evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'An employer can in writing obligate itself to follow portions of a collective bargaining agreement without signing the collective bargaining agreement itself.' ... Indeed, a CBA need not even be reduced to writing. 'Instead, what is required is conduct manifesting an intention to abide by the terms of an agreement.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.