Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 776 F.3d 296 - Wilson v. Epps

Wilson v. Epps’s Empirical Analysis

776 F.3d 296 · 2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Jones v. Bock · Dillon v. Rogers · Underwood v. Wilson · Mark Eric Wright v. Gayle Hollingsworth Etc et al. · Wendell v. Asher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his argument deserves close[] scrutiny, because, under some circumstances, a prison's failure to respond to a prisoner’s grievance can result in the prisoner’s administrative remedies being deemed exhausted.” Id. The relevant cir cumstances, we explained, are the requirements of the prison's grievance procedures. The grievance procedures at issue in Wilson stated that if a prisoner does not receive a response to his grievance, the prisoner is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.