Tanner v. Yukins’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.3d 434 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2107 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Bounds v. Smith · Bowles v. Russell · Gonzalez v. Crosby · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“which are not addressed by the first five numbered clauses of the Rule and only as a means to achieve substantial justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. BYRD VS. BYRD · Byrd v. Byrd“Rule 60(b)(6) is available only in extraordinary circumstances,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. BYRD VS. BYRD · Byrd v. Byrd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.