Acuity v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
776 F.3d 588 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Berkley & Co. · Diesel Machinery, Inc. v. B.R. Lee Industries, Inc. · White v. Honeywell, Inc. · Wiles v. Capitol Indemnity Corp. · Grain Land Coop v. Kar Kim Farms, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“misled the jury or had a probable effect on its verdict”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dean v. Searcey · Singer v. Harris“consider[ ] whether taken as a whole and viewed in light of the evidence and applicable law, [the court] fairly and adequately submitted the issues in the case to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singer v. Harris“We review a district court's decision to give particular [jury] instructions for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singer v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.