Larson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl · Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. · Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista · Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services · Farnes v. Freeman Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever claiming that an easement acquired by condemnation is not being used for the purposes for which it was acquired, the underlying fee owner may apply to the district court of the county in which the land is situated for an order discharging the easement, upon such terms as are just and equitable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Larson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.