State v. Lavoto’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2011
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garrett v. United States · State v. Hansen · State v. Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the period prescribed in subsection 76-1-302(1) has expired, a prosecution may nevertheless be commenced for: [[Image here]] (c) Rape of a child, object rape of a child, sodomy upon a child, or sexual abuse of a child within one year after the report of the offense to law enforcement officials, so long as no more than eight years has elapsed since the alleged commission of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lusk“the exact names of the erimes in [section] 76-1-803(c)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lusk“supported by the language of [the statute] itself”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lusk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.