776 So. 2d 133 - Ex Parte Howle’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 406 So. 2d 337 - Terrell v. City of Bessemer · 699 So. 2d 1238 - Parmater v. Amcord, Inc. · 450 So. 2d 99 - Ex Parte Harrington · 503 So. 2d 830 - Weil v. Lammon · 460 So. 2d 1290 - Jackson v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Tyndal reserved the issue of the alleged battery and that issue was severed; Tyndal, nevertheless, raised that issue in the divorce action and, as a result of the judgment in that action, accepted payment of medical expenses related to the alleged battery. Had she adhered to her reservation of the issue of the alleged battery, this would be a different case. However, on the facts of this case, the trial court correctly entered the summary judgment in favor of Howie on Tyndal’s assault-and-battery claim because that claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osborne v. Osborne“(1) a prior judgment on the merits, (2) rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) with substantial identity of the parties, and (4) with the same cause of action presented in both actions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.