776 So. 2d 376 - State v. Anthony’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 57 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonations of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questioning.”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Eugene · 942 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Gant

2. “(2) The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his impartiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and the court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence[.]”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Smith · 182 So. 3d 251 - State v. Jones

3. “( [E]ven without establishing that defendant was the triggerman, his conviction is valid because he was involved in this felony murder and he intended, from the outset, to kill their victims.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Holmes · State v. Wright