McCracking v. McCracking’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 555 So. 2d 1017 - RC Petroleum, Inc. v. Hernandez · 682 So. 2d 374 - Touchstone v. Touchstone · 730 So. 2d 581 - Weigand v. Houghton · 562 So. 2d 97 - Arnold v. Conwill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a custody modification proceeding, the question of which parent will better serve the welfare of the children as custodial parent is not reached unless the chancellor has previously found a material change in circumstance detrimental to the child's best interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that a visitation schedule that adversely affects a child's emotional stability is one that is not working within the meaning of Suess.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.