Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 776 So. 2d 896 - Tuohy v. State

776 So. 2d 896 - Tuohy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Alabama v. White · United States v. Sharpe · United States v. Hensley · Hayes v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n reviewing a decision of a trial court on a motion to suppress evidence, in a case in which the facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““I was driving my car (a 1975 Plymouth Valiant). No one was with me. I decided to stop at a dirt road and snort my cocaine. I bought the cocaine in Mobile and brought it to Spanish Fort. “I got out of the car to urinate and found a bunch of credit cards on the ground. I picked them up and left[,] going to Mobile. I kept a few of them but some of them I threw away. I went to Springdale and Bel-Air Malls and used the cards. I had my younger brother with me. I was wearing a Dallas Star’s Hockey Jersey. Later I went to Gayfers. I knew security was looking for me so I kind of hid from them. “My friend and I came back this morning looking for more credit cards. We parked on the same dirt road, then the police came and took us to the police department.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court must be apprised of the basis for the objection with sufficient particularity to allow an informed decision to be made on the particular legal issue involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.