776 So. 2d 943 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Watson v. Louisiana · State v. Cotton · 452 So. 2d 520 - Blanco v. State · 648 So. 2d 715 - Perez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pretrial identification is considered a 'show-up' procedure where the police take a witness, shortly after the commission of an observed crime, to where the police are detaining the suspect, in order to give them an opportunity to make an identification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The decision to admit a pre-trial identification is within the sound discretion of the trial court and the decision should be overturned only upon a showing of abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) the witness' opportunity to view the suspect at the time of the crime; (b) the witness' degree of attention; (c) the accuracy of the witness' prior description of the suspect; (d) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation; and (e) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.