Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

776 So. 2d 986

Orr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-01-10

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2017

4 state decisions

Relies on 761 So. 2d 1015 - Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm as untimely that part of the appeal which seeks review of appellant’s 1995 conviction. To the extent Orr is appealing the denial of his trial court motion (whether it be a 3.800 or 3.850 motion) directed to his 1999 revocation of probation and resulting sentences, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice. Orr already has pending in this court direct appeals of those revocations in case numbers 4D99-4339, 4D99-4340, and 4D99-4341. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) and 3.800 and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h), 9.14-0, and 9.600, 761 So.2d 1015 (Fla.1999).

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/776/so2d/986 · .json · Public domain